t: 0114 698 8151 e: info@compensationadviser.co.uk

Claim Compensation for a Mis-sold FSAVC

Many people were advised to take out Free-Standing Additional Voluntary Contributions (FSAVCs) instead of joining their employer’s in-house AVC scheme, often resulting in higher charges and lost benefits. If you were advised to take out an FSAVC when a better workplace option was available, a compensation claim may be possible — even if the firm has already rejected your complaint.

Start Your Claim

Or call us on 0114 6988151

important information about scam and fraud claims

Why Choose Compensation Adviser?

We specialise in complex pension advice complaints. Our team understands the regulatory standards that applied when FSAVCs were sold, allowing us to build strong, evidence-based claims on your behalf.

No-Obligation Review

We can review the information you have about the FSAVC advice and discuss the available complaint routes at no cost and with no obligation.

No-Win, No-Fee

If we do not recover money for you, there is no fee to pay. Our fee is 15% + VAT of any compensation awarded.

Your Free Options Remain Available

You can pursue a complaint directly and use any relevant free ombudsman or compensation scheme route without using us.

What Was an FSAVC?

Free-Standing Additional Voluntary Contributions (FSAVCs) were introduced in April 1988 to allow workers to build up extra retirement savings alongside their main occupational pension. Unlike in-house Additional Voluntary Contributions (AVCs) arranged through an employer’s scheme, an FSAVC is a separate policy taken out directly with a life assurance or pension company. The Financial Ombudsman Service explains that FSAVCs are distinct from an employer’s in-house AVC arrangement and that the two products can differ significantly in charges, investment options, and available benefits.

How Were You Advised?

When you took out an FSAVC, your financial adviser or the insurance company’s representative was required by the regulators of the time — including FIMBRA, LAUTRO, and later the PIA — to consider your overall financial position. Crucially, if your employer offered an in-house AVC scheme, the adviser should have pointed this out, explained that the employer’s scheme was likely to provide better value for money, and recommended you consider it before recommending an FSAVC. Independent financial advisers were required to investigate the AVC option on your behalf and recommend it if it was the better choice.

Why Might the Advice Have Been Unsuitable?

The Financial Ombudsman Service identifies two main types of FSAVC complaint: being advised to take an FSAVC instead of joining an employer’s in-house AVC scheme, and being advised to invest in a money-purchase AVC or FSAVC instead of buying ‘added years’ in a final salary scheme. FSAVCs typically carried higher charges and commissions than in-house alternatives. In some cases, savers also missed out on employer-matching contributions by choosing an FSAVC, leaving them with a smaller retirement pot than they would otherwise have accumulated. The FSA conducted a formal review of FSAVCs sold between 29 April 1988 and 15 August 1999, reflecting the scale of concern about how these products were sold.

Signs Your FSAVC Advice May Have Been Unsuitable

The following points may indicate that it is worth checking the advice you received. They are not proof that an FSAVC was mis-sold or that compensation will be due.

You were not told that your employer offered an in-house AVC arrangement.

No one explained the likely difference in charges or expenses between an FSAVC and the employer's in-house AVC scheme.

Your adviser did not discuss scheme-specific ways of buying additional pension benefits, such as purchasing added years in a final salary scheme.

You were given only a generic instruction to ask your employer, without a meaningful comparison of the FSAVC and the available in-house option.

The recommendation did not appear to take account of your retirement plans, job prospects, or capacity to benefit from the FSAVC over the long term.

The firm's records do not show that you received enough information to make an informed choice between the FSAVC and the available employer scheme options.

Learn more about Investment Claims

What to Do If You Believe Your FSAVC Was Mis-sold

Gather the available paperwork

Locate any advice or suitability report, application form, policy schedule, annual statements, illustrations, charges information, correspondence, and any previous complaint records.

Identify the responsible business

Identify the adviser, financial firm, or provider that gave the advice or sold the FSAVC. If the firm has changed name or been taken over, you may still be able to complain to the successor.

Complain formally to the business

Set out what advice you received, what alternatives you believe were not explained, and what loss you consider you have suffered. Keep a copy of your complaint and note the date it was sent.

Keep the dates and final response

Keep a copy of the complaint, note when it was sent, and retain any final response letter. These dates are important if you need to escalate to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Use the relevant free route if appropriate

For an eligible complaint about an FCA-regulated, still-trading business, the Financial Ombudsman Service may be able to help if the firm does not resolve the complaint or does not reply within eight weeks. If the responsible firm has failed, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme may be relevant, subject to its eligibility rules.

Check your options before instructing a claims management company

You are not required to use a claims management company. You can pursue the complaint and any free route yourself. If you would like us to review the available information and help with the process, contact us for a no-obligation discussion.

Contact Compensation Adviser

Can I Claim Compensation for a Mis-sold FSAVC?

If you received unsuitable advice to take out an FSAVC, a claim may be possible. The first step is to complain formally to the adviser or firm that sold you the policy. If they reject your complaint or do not respond within eight weeks, you may be able to escalate to the Financial Ombudsman Service, provided the complaint meets their eligibility criteria and time limits. If the firm that advised you is no longer trading, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme may be relevant, subject to their eligibility rules and the circumstances of the claim.

Why Choose Compensation Adviser for Your FSAVC Claim?

Specialist Knowledge: We understand the specific FIMBRA and PIA regulatory rules that applied when most FSAVCs were sold, and how the Financial Ombudsman Service approaches these complaints.
Evidence-Led Approach: We review your pension paperwork carefully to assess whether an in-house AVC or added-years option would have been more suitable for your circumstances.
Thorough Investigation: We research successor firms if your original adviser has been taken over or changed names, so the right business is identified.
Stress-Free Process: We manage correspondence with the firm, the FOS, or the FSCS on your behalf, keeping you informed at each stage.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an FSAVC?

An FSAVC is a Free-Standing Additional Voluntary Contribution pension arrangement taken with a pension company, separate from an employer’s scheme. The Financial Ombudsman Service distinguishes it from an employer’s in-house AVC arrangement, which may have had lower charges or employer-matching contributions.

Were all FSAVCs mis-sold?

No. The availability of an employer’s in-house AVC or added-years option, and whether it was adequately explained, are key factors. An FSAVC may have been suitable in some circumstances, for example where the consumer specifically wanted investment options not available in the employer’s scheme. Each case depends on its own facts.

Can similar issues apply to other workplace pension schemes?

Potentially. Some defined-benefit schemes had their own in-house AVCs or ways to purchase added years. If an adviser recommended an FSAVC without properly explaining these alternatives, a complaint may be worth considering. The relevant rules and routes will depend on the specific scheme and the facts of the advice.

Is it too late to complain about historic FSAVC advice?

It depends. The Financial Ombudsman Service applies time limits to complaints. These generally run from when you became aware, or should reasonably have become aware, that the advice may have been unsuitable. If you are unsure whether a complaint is still possible, we recommend seeking a review as soon as possible.

Can I complain myself for free?

Yes. You do not need to use a claims management company. You can complain directly to the firm that gave the advice, and if that does not resolve the matter, you may be able to use the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme free of charge, subject to their eligibility rules.

What are your fees?

We operate on a no-win, no-fee basis. If your claim is successful, we charge a fee of 15% + VAT of the total compensation awarded. If we do not recover any money for you, there is no fee to pay.

Contact our specialist team today to find out if you have grounds for a mis-sold FSAVC claim.