Fraud Blocker

Investment Claims

Did You Lose Money on a Failed or Unsuitable Investment?

If you invested money in a product that was not right for you – or that was promoted, marketed, or sold in a way that did not give you the full picture – you may have grounds for a compensation claim. Whether you were advised by a financial professional, approached directly by a promoter, or found the opportunity through a platform or introducer, the rules around how investments can be sold to retail investors are strict. Where those rules may not have been followed and you suffered a loss, there may be a route to recovering it. We review your case for free and tell you honestly whether a claim is worth pursuing.

What Is a Mis-Sold Investment Claim?

A mis-sold investment claim arises when a financial product was sold, promoted, or marketed to you in a way that did not meet the standards required under UK financial regulation – and you suffered a loss as a result.

This does not only apply to cases where a financial adviser gave you unsuitable advice. It also covers situations where a product was sold directly to you without proper explanation of the risks, where an introducer or promoter misrepresented what you were buying, where the charges or terms were not made clear, or where the product itself was not appropriate for retail investors but was marketed as though it were.

Under FCA rules, anyone involved in promoting or selling a regulated investment to retail consumers has obligations. Those obligations include being honest about what the product is, who it is suitable for, what the risks are, and what could go wrong. If those obligations weren’t met and you lost money as a result, you may have grounds for a complaint.

The Financial Ombudsman Service considers a wide range of mis-selling complaints each year. Where the firm involved has since failed, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme can pay compensation of up to £85,000 per eligible claimant. The question is not simply whether your investment performed badly. It is whether the way it was sold to you met the standard it was legally required to meet.

How Compensation Adviser Reviews Mis-Sold Investment Claims

We carry out a free initial case review to assess whether the investment was sold, promoted, or marketed to you in a way that meets the required standards under FCA rules.

We identify whether the product was appropriate for retail investors, whether the risks and charges were properly disclosed, and whether the way you came to invest — through an adviser, platform, introducer, or direct promotion — raises concerns.

We review the evidence available — including any documentation you received about the product, how you were approached, and what you were told — to determine the strongest complaint route.

We prepare and submit your complaint to the relevant firm, setting out clearly where the obligations owed to you may not have been met and the losses you experienced.

If the firm refuses or under-compensates, we escalate to the Financial Ombudsman Service and manage the full process on your behalf. Where the firm has failed, we manage claims through the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

FCA regulated, no upfront fees – 15% + VAT success fee only your claim is successful.

Mis-sold Investments — Some Cases We Are Currently Reviewing

79th Group

UK investors in overseas property schemes report being unable to access funds or receive clear updates. Concerns have been raised about how these schemes were marketed and managed

Apex Algorithms

Apex Algorithms, a gambling investment scheme based in Folkestone, is at the centre of a £5.2 million fraud investigation.

Buy 2 Let Cars Ltd

Buy 2 Let Cars Ltd collapsed into administration in March 2021 and its former directors have been charged by the Serious Fraud Office with fraud relating to approximately £88 million invested by hundreds of UK savers.

CityGate Housing Ltd

CityGate Housing Limited was placed into compulsory liquidation in June 2025 following a City of London Police investigation into alleged fraud.

Concept Capital Group

Concept Capital Group was placed into administration in March 2026 following an FCA investigation into an alleged £23 million unauthorised investment scheme.

Cosetek (Coscoin / COS)

Cosetek, also known as Coscoin or COS, collapsed in November 2023 after operating as an unlicensed cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme, leaving thousands of UK investors unable to withdraw their funds.

Diamond Ridge Financial Academy

Diamond Ridge Financial Academy was issued a formal warning by the FCA in June 2025 for providing financial services without authorisation.

Fabcourt Developments

Fabcourt Developments was part of the Sentor group — a systematic investment fraud that took over £2 million from investors through fake “convertible loan notes” promising 8–14% returns on non-existent property developments. The FCA warned against them in March 2021, and the High Court wound them up in August 2022.

Fortress Capital Partners

Fortress Capital Partners entered administration in September 2023, with administrators labelling the unregulated scheme a Ponzi scheme following the loss of an estimated £18 million.

Home REIT

Investors who received financial advice to place money into Home REIT may have grounds for a complaint depending on how the advice was given and whether it was suitable for their circumstance.

HW Consulting Group

HW Consulting Group Limited, operated by Harry Winter, was a forex trading firm that was wound down in August 2025 following discontinued payments to investors.

Imperial Investment Fund

The Imperial Investment Fund was an unauthorised £1.3 million Ponzi scheme run by Daniel Pugh, who was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison for fraud in October 2025.

Incomation

Incomation was an AI trading bot platform that collapsed in late 2023 after failing to deliver promised returns to investors.

Ironclad Investments

Ironclad Investments (also known as IC Investing Ltd and Ironclad Markets) was issued a formal FCA warning in January 2023 as an unauthorised firm, and is now subject to an ongoing police investigation for alleged fraud.

Moneda Capital Group

Moneda Capital Group was placed under investigation by the FCA in October 2025 following a full asset restraint order to prevent further funds leaving the firm.

Monetio

Monetio (monetio.io) was issued a formal warning by the FCA in August 2024 for providing unauthorised financial services and is now closed.

Nuvilon

Nuvilon was issued a formal warning by the FCA on 30 July 2025 as an unauthorised firm providing financial services without permission in the UK.

OrcaTrade / Orca Alliance

A crypto trading platform with widespread reports of withdrawal problems.

Ostin Technology Group (OST)

Ostin Technology Group (OST) was the centre of a massive $950 million ‘pump-and-dump’ scheme that collapsed in June 2025.

Raedex Consortium Limited

Raedex Consortium Limited was placed into administration in March 2021 following FCA intervention, and was declared in default by the FSCS in April 2025.

Safely Investing Ltd

Safely Investing Ltd, directed by Adnan Adil Shah, stopped paying investors returns and the FCA issued a formal warning in November 2025.

Sentor Solutions Commercial Ltd

Sentor Solutions Commercial Ltd was wound up by the High Court in August 2022 following an Insolvency Service investigation into a £2 million investment fraud involving fictitious property developments.

TriumphFX

TriumphFX has been the subject of multiple regulatory warnings globally, including from the FCA, and its operators are currently under criminal investigation for alleged fraud.

Vaquita Capital Investment

Vaquita Capital was issued a formal FCA warning in April 2023 for operating without authorisation, following investigations into an alleged investment scam.

WealthTek LLP

WealthTek LLP was placed into special administration in April 2023 after the FCA identified a shortfall of over £81 million in client money and assets, with its principal partner now facing criminal charges for alleged fraud and money laundering.

Wheels4Sure

Raedex Consortium Limited, trading as Wheels4Sure, entered administration in March 2021 and is now subject to a Serious Fraud Office prosecution for an £88 million car leasing investment fraud.

XTradeMAX

XTradeMAX was issued a formal warning by the Financial Conduct Authority in May 2025 for providing financial services without authorisation.

Getting Started Takes Minutes

1
Tell us what happened. There's no obligation, no cost, and no pressure. We'll review your situation and let you know honestly whether you have a case worth pursuing.
Free Assessment
2
Our regulated team handles the paperwork, the correspondence, and the process. You don't need to deal with the bank or the firm directly.
We Do the Work
3
If we win, we take 15% + VAT of the compensation recovered (capped at £7,500 + VAT). If we don't win, you pay nothing.
You Get Paid
Start Your Free Claim Review

Can You Claim Compensation for a Mis-Sold Investment?

The viability of a claim depends on several factors. How the investment was sold to you, who was involved in that process, whether any regulated firm or individual played a role, and what evidence is available. It does not depend solely on whether your investment lost money, and it does not require that you received formal financial advice.

Where a regulated firm was involved in selling, promoting, or introducing the investment — even if that firm was not your personal financial adviser — a complaint route may exist. If that firm is still operating, complaints are made to them directly. They have eight weeks to respond. If their response is unsatisfactory, your complaint moves to the Financial Ombudsman Service, which can award compensation of up to £430,000 for acts or omissions after April 2019.

If the firm has since failed and been declared in default, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme steps in. The FSCS can pay up to £85,000 per eligible claimant where the loss arose from the regulated activity of an FCA-authorised firm.

In both routes, the aim is to put you back, as far as possible, in the financial position you would have been in had the investment been sold to you properly — covering investment losses, charges paid, and opportunity costs where applicable.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if my investment was mis-sold?

The key question is whether the investment was sold, promoted, or marketed to you in a way that met the standards required under FCA rules. That includes whether the risks were clearly explained, whether the product was appropriate for someone in your circumstances, whether all charges and terms were disclosed, and whether you were given a fair and honest picture of what you were buying. A free review will determine whether you have grounds for a complaint.

I was not given formal financial advice — can I still claim?

Yes, in many cases. Not all mis-sold investment claims involve a financial adviser. If an investment was sold or promoted to you directly — through a platform, introducer, marketing campaign, or direct contact — and the way it was sold did not meet the required standards, a complaint may still be possible. The involvement of any regulated firm in the process is the key factor, not whether you received formal personal advice.

Does it matter if my investment performed reasonably well?

Not necessarily. A claim can still be valid even where the investment did not ultimately lose money — for example, where charges were not properly disclosed, or where the product was sold in a way that did not meet regulatory requirements. Each case is assessed on its own facts.

What if the firm involved has closed down?

If the firm has been declared in default by the FSCS, you can make a claim directly through the scheme. The FSCS can compensate up to £85,000 per eligible person per firm where the loss arose from the regulated activity of an FCA-authorised firm. We manage FSCS claims on your behalf.

How long do I have to make a claim?

Time limits vary depending on the route and the product. FOS rules generally allow six years from the relevant event, or three years from when you first became aware that you may have a valid complaint — whichever is later. Contact us for a free assessment so we can confirm the position in your specific case.

Do I need documentary evidence to start a claim?

It helps, but a lack of documentation does not automatically close off a claim. Useful evidence includes any promotional material you received, correspondence about the investment, product documents, and account statements. We can often obtain documentation from the relevant firm or product provider on your behalf.

Will I have to go to court?

In the vast majority of cases, no. Most mis-sold investment claims are resolved through the Financial Ombudsman Service or FSCS without any court proceedings. We manage the full process and keep you informed at every stage.

Important Information

You are not required to use our services to pursue your claim. You can also seek further advice or shop around subject to any time limits within which a claim must be made.

It is possible for you to present the claim for free, either to the bank, business or person against whom you wish to complain or to the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, whichever is applicable to your claim.

Recent Blog Posts

Read All Stories